Report an error
Popularity of the first name Erick correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Annual book sales in the US | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Greece | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Greece | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
The number of vending machine repairers in Tennessee | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
Arson in Iowa | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
Electricity generation in United Kingdom | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Arson in Idaho | r=0.88 | 22yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton | r=0.87 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Oklahoma | r=0.85 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Erick also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)