Report an error
Popularity of the first name Parker correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.99 | 12yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Trinidad and Tobago | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in South Korea | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.97 | 43yrs | No |
| The number of network systems administrators in Indiana | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
| US production of yogurt, nonfrozen | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.95 | 44yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'google' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Nuclear power generation in Romania | r=0.94 | 26yrs | Yes! |
| UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.93 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Nevada | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Oklahoma | r=0.9 | 47yrs | Yes! |
| UFO sightings in Minnesota | r=0.89 | 47yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to hide a body' | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Wyoming | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Parker also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)