Report an error
Popularity of the first name Isabella correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of executive administrative assistants in North Carolina | r=0.99 | 13yrs | No |
| Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Fridays | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Cyprus | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
| Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.96 | 37yrs | No |
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Illinois | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Missouri | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
| The number of university political science teachers in Ohio | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in New York | r=0.89 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in North Carolina | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls issued by Nissan North America | r=0.75 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Isabella also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)