Report an error
Popularity of the first name Jeremiah correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
The number of microbiologists in South Dakota | r=0.78 | 14yrs | No |
Points scored by the New England Patriots | r=0.75 | 48yrs | Yes! |
Total Points scored by the New England Patriots in the NFL season | r=0.75 | 48yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Jeremiah also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)