Report an error
Popularity of the first name Levi correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Geothermal power generated in New Zealand | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'red pill blue pill' meme | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.97 | 24yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.97 | 46yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Spain | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Chunghwa Telecom Co.'s stock price (CHT) | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Levi also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)