Report an error
Popularity of the first name Alan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
US production of cream products | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
Average length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
The number of conveyor operators in Arkansas | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
The number of telemarketers in Florida | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
The number of laundry and dry-cleaning workers in Puerto Rico | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'panama canal' | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC) | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
Google searches for 'shook' | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Montana | r=0.75 | 23yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Germany | r=0.73 | 31yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)