Report an error
Popularity of the first name Sophia correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.97 | 37yrs | No |
| Biomass power generated in Netherlands | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Missouri | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.94 | 32yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Michigan | r=0.94 | 47yrs | Yes! |
| UFO sightings in Indiana | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
| The number of probation officers in Wyoming | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.92 | 44yrs | No |
| Gasoline Prices in the US | r=0.88 | 33yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sophia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)