Report an error
Number of Earthquakes in the United States correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of pediatricians in Washington | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Georgia | r=0.89 | 21yrs | No |
The number of library assistants in Utah | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in South Dakota | r=0.87 | 8yrs | Yes! |
US bank failures | r=0.83 | 13yrs | No |
The number of movies Benedict Cumberbatch appeared in | r=0.82 | 11yrs | No |
Unemployment Rate in the United States | r=0.72 | 23yrs | No |
Unemployment in the US | r=0.72 | 23yrs | No |
Super Bowl TV viewership | r=0.65 | 23yrs | No |
Number of Earthquakes in the United States also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)