Report an error
Popularity of the first name Melanie correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of special education teachers in North Carolina | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Fridays | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Rochester, Minnesota | r=0.71 | 43yrs | No |
| Global count of operating nuclear power plants | r=-0.81 | 48yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=-0.89 | 19yrs | No |
| Walmart's stock price (WMT) | r=-0.91 | 21yrs | No |
| Amazon.com's stock price (AMZN) | r=-0.92 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Melanie also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)