Report an error
Popularity of the first name Claire correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.99 | 39yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Mercury | r=0.96 | 48yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Netherlands | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Arkansas | r=0.9 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Ticket sales for San Francisco Giants games | r=0.89 | 45yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 2nd grade | r=0.88 | 33yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.86 | 37yrs | No |
The number of gas compressor and gas pumping station operators in West Virginia | r=0.86 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Season wins for the Houston Texans | r=0.6 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Claire also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)