Report an error
Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of computer user support specialists in Michigan | r=0.95 | 7yrs | No |
The number of exercise physiologists in South Carolina | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
The number of ophthalmic medical technicians in Montana | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about star wars | r=0.82 | 12yrs | No |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in California | r=0.81 | 7yrs | Yes! |
Nuclear power generation in Netherlands | r=0.51 | 29yrs | No |
Number of moderate earthquakes worldwide also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)