Report an error
Popularity of the first name Bryce correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| How insightful LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Texas | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
| Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| US average milk-fat content of milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in United Kingdom | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Colorado | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
| Burglaries in Puerto Rico | r=0.95 | 24yrs | No |
| US production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Washington | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.94 | 39yrs | No |
| Arson in Iowa | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
| Number of Slot Machines in Nevada | r=0.9 | 39yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bryce also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)