Report an error
Popularity of the first name Alexa correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.96 | 39yrs | No |
Average length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 8yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Australia | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in El Salvador | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in United States | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Patents granted to Toshiba | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Bermuda | r=0.89 | 42yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.85 | 37yrs | No |
Ticket sales for Boston Red Sox games | r=0.79 | 45yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Michigan | r=0.73 | 47yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.65 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alexa also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)