Report an error
Popularity of the first name Molly correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The divorce rate in West Virginia | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
The number of animal control workers in Oregon | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Kansas | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.93 | 14yrs | No |
Robberies in Ohio | r=0.92 | 38yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
The marriage rate in North Dakota | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.85 | 20yrs | No |
Robberies in Puerto Rico | r=0.85 | 24yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Molly also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)