Report an error
Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.76 | 13yrs | No |
The number of pipelayers in South Dakota | r=0.69 | 20yrs | No |
The number of university political science teachers in South Dakota | r=0.65 | 16yrs | No |
Dollar General's stock price (DG) | r=0.51 | 14yrs | No |
Amount spent on Pet Gifts on Valentine's Day in the US | r=-0.88 | 9yrs | No |
Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)