Report an error
Air pollution in Washington, D.C. correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Business and management | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and the Sun | r=0.93 | 44yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Neptune and the moon | r=0.93 | 44yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Marc | r=0.92 | 43yrs | No |
Arson in United States | r=0.9 | 38yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Peru | r=0.9 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Ice cream consumption | r=0.9 | 32yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.89 | 32yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Austria | r=0.89 | 43yrs | No |
Robberies in the US | r=0.84 | 38yrs | No |
Violent crime rates | r=0.81 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Washington, D.C. also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)