Report an error
Popularity of the first name Paul correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of sewing machine operators in California | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Burglaries in New York | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Burglaries in California | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Arkansas | r=0.98 | 23yrs | No |
The number of switchboard operators in Massachusetts | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Arson in New York | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.96 | 36yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Tennessee | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.96 | 48yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and the moon | r=0.96 | 48yrs | No |
Carjackings in the US | r=0.96 | 27yrs | No |
Burglary rates in the US | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Viewership count for Days of Our Lives | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Uzbekistan | r=0.91 | 30yrs | No |
Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=0.91 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Paul also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)