Report an error
Air pollution in San Diego, California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Kirk | r=0.97 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Kathleen | r=0.97 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Douglas | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alicia | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ross | r=0.94 | 43yrs | No |
Burglaries in California | r=0.93 | 38yrs | No |
Arson in California | r=0.93 | 38yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and the Sun | r=0.93 | 44yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name William | r=0.91 | 43yrs | No |
Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=0.81 | 43yrs | No |
The number of technical writers in California | r=0.6 | 20yrs | No |
Air pollution in San Diego, California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)