Report an error
Popularity of the first name Ian correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of counter and rental clerks in Pennsylvania | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
The number of bill collectors in Illinois | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Average length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
The number of floral designers in Indiana | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
United States music album sales | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
Patents granted to Toshiba | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Arson in Idaho | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and the Sun | r=0.92 | 48yrs | No |
Electricity generation in United Kingdom | r=0.9 | 42yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.86 | 39yrs | No |
Visitors to SeaWorld California | r=0.77 | 15yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Italy | r=0.74 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ian also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)