Report an error
Air quality in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Solar power generated in Malawi | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Vietnam | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'spiderman pointing' meme | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'adopt a cat' | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of transportation workers in Pennsylvania | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i am dizzy' | r=0.86 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of movies Denzel Washington appeared in | r=0.6 | 44yrs | No |
Air quality in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)