Report an error
Popularity of the first name Nathaniel correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of recreational therapists in Connecticut | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
The number of travel agents in Connecticut | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
U.S. intercountry adoptions | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
The number of computer programmers in Michigan | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
The number of CEOs in Michigan | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
Arson in Idaho | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Arson in Iowa | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Florida | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
US household spending on fresh milk and cream | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Maine | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'learn spanish' | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.85 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Nathaniel also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)