Report an error
Air pollution in Ottawa correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Customer satisfaction with Walgreens | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Madyson | r=0.92 | 26yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Slovenia | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Madisyn | r=0.88 | 25yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Chile | r=0.88 | 27yrs | No |
Lionel Messi's match count with Argentina | r=0.86 | 6yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Aruba | r=0.86 | 25yrs | No |
Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.85 | 22yrs | No |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.79 | 21yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.77 | 31yrs | No |
Total number of automotive recalls | r=0.74 | 31yrs | No |
Rain in Berlin | r=0.73 | 20yrs | No |
Air pollution in Ottawa also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)