Report an error
Popularity of the first name Sierra correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in Transportation | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Physical album shipment volume in the United States | r=0.97 | 24yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Slovenia | r=0.95 | 31yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.91 | 14yrs | No |
| Ticket sales for Cleveland Guardians games | r=0.87 | 45yrs | No |
| Ticket sales for Baltimore Orioles games | r=0.85 | 45yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sierra also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)