Report an error
Budget for largest movie production correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
US dairy skim solids used to produce cream products | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
US production of cream products | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Alabama | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Barbados | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Geothermal power generated in Portugal | r=0.9 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Mariam | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Netherlands | r=0.9 | 42yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Australia | r=0.9 | 43yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.88 | 36yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.87 | 44yrs | Yes! |
Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.87 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sadie | r=0.87 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Cruz | r=0.87 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Valentin | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Nevada | r=0.84 | 46yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Missouri | r=0.83 | 46yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Minnesota | r=0.83 | 46yrs | No |
Budget for largest movie production also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)