Report an error
Popularity of the first name Angel correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of switchboard operators in Arizona | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in Greece | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in New Zealand | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
| Arson in Iowa | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
| GMO use in cotton in Alabama | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No |
| US production of cottage cheese | r=0.9 | 22yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in Austria | r=0.9 | 43yrs | No |
| US dairy skim solids used to produce milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk | r=0.88 | 22yrs | No |
| GMO use in cotton | r=0.88 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Angel also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)