Report an error
US hotel industry's revenue per available room correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Movies Released Annually | r=0.97 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Movie Releases in the US & Canada | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
The number of fire inspectors in North Carolina | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Lithuania | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
Conoco Phillips' stock price (COP) | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce's stock price (CM) | r=0.93 | 13yrs | No |
Halliburton Company's stock price (HAL) | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No |
The number of music directors and composers in Washington | r=0.89 | 12yrs | No |
Air quality in Akron, Ohio | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
Points scored by the Dallas Cowboys | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on gasoline | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
Wins for the New York Yankees | r=-0.86 | 14yrs | No |
US hotel industry's revenue per available room also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)