Report an error
Air pollution in Los Angeles correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Timothy | r=0.97 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Frank | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Steve | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Harry | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Adam | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Yvonne | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Mercury | r=0.93 | 44yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marta | r=0.91 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ryan | r=0.91 | 43yrs | No |
Frozen yogurt consumption | r=0.86 | 32yrs | No |
Air pollution in Los Angeles also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)