Report an error
Popularity of the first name Gabriel correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of meter readers, utilities in California | r=0.99 | 19yrs | No |
| Global iPod Sales | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
| The number of telemarketers in Colorado | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of telemarketers in Washington | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Oklahoma | r=0.95 | 18yrs | No |
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.95 | 39yrs | No |
| United States music album sales | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
| Highway diesel consumption in US | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to do magic' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in California | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Texas | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
| Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.88 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'xbox' | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.78 | 44yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gabriel also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)