Report an error
Air pollution in Lincoln, Nebraska correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'bing' | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i have the flu' | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
Google searches for 'zombies' | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
US bank failures | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Domino's Pizza Group's Earnings per Share | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
Google searches for 'why do i have green poop' | r=0.89 | 6yrs | No |
Air pollution in Lincoln, Nebraska also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)