Report an error
Popularity of the first name Caleb correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Gasoline pumped in Japan | r=0.99 | 43yrs | No |
| The number of payroll and timekeeping clerks in Mississippi | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Accounting | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in United Kingdom | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
| US production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.95 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Caleb also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)