Report an error
Air pollution in Dallas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Physical album shipment volume in the United States | r=0.91 | 24yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used globally | r=0.89 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in El Salvador | r=0.88 | 42yrs | No |
Kerosene used in United States | r=0.87 | 43yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Slovenia | r=0.85 | 31yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Joseph | r=0.84 | 43yrs | No |
The number of university biological science teachers in Texas | r=0.83 | 20yrs | No |
US milk fat used to produce fluid beverage milk | r=0.83 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'why isnt 11 pronounced onety one' | r=0.8 | 19yrs | No |
Arson in United States | r=0.78 | 38yrs | Yes! |
NASA's budget as a percentage of the total US Federal Budget | r=0.69 | 44yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls issued by Honda | r=-0.69 | 43yrs | No |
Air pollution in Dallas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)