Report an error
Popularity of the first name Abigail correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
The number of human resources assistants in Indiana | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Culinary Associates degrees awarded | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
US production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
United States music album sales | r=0.94 | 16yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Montana | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
UFO sightings in California | r=0.86 | 47yrs | No |
Google searches for 'panama canal' | r=0.85 | 19yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.75 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abigail also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)