Report an error
Popularity of the first name Katherine correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Physical album shipment volume in the United States | r=0.98 | 24yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Burglaries in Hawaii | r=0.98 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Burglaries in Wyoming | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
Burglary rates in the US | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Panama Canal' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'learn spanish' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
U.S. intercountry adoptions | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in North Korea | r=0.86 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Katherine also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)