Report an error
Air pollution in Boise City correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average number of comments on minutephysics YouTube videos | r=0.84 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'n95 mask' | r=0.83 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'adopt a dog' | r=0.79 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'i am once again' meme | r=0.71 | 17yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Guinea | r=0.71 | 42yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Sweden | r=0.61 | 39yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Idaho | r=0.58 | 42yrs | Yes! |
American Electric Power Company's stock price (AEP) | r=0.57 | 21yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America | r=0.51 | 43yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.49 | 21yrs | No |
Air pollution in Boise City also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)