Report an error
Popularity of the first name Jennifer correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of compensation and benefits managers in Indiana | r=1 | 19yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Nevada | r=0.99 | 23yrs | No |
The number of CEOs in Ohio | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
Burglaries in Colorado | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
Burglaries in Oregon | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Mexico | r=0.98 | 40yrs | No |
US household spending on books | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'black holes' | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Tennessee | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.96 | 36yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
Air pollution in Norwich, Connecticut | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=0.94 | 43yrs | No |
Burglaries in Oklahoma | r=0.93 | 38yrs | No |
Kerosene used in United States | r=0.9 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jennifer also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)