Report an error
Air pollution in Albany, New York correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.88 | 16yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about romance | r=0.88 | 17yrs | No |
The number of computer programmers in New York | r=0.8 | 20yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Croatia | r=0.79 | 30yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.72 | 32yrs | No |
Air pollution in Albany, New York also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)