Report an error
Robberies in California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Dominique | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
The wind speed in San Diego | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rebecca | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Frozen yogurt consumption | r=0.94 | 32yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Austria | r=0.93 | 38yrs | Yes! |
The number of postal service machine operators in California | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.9 | 36yrs | No |
NASA's budget as a percentage of the total US Federal Budget | r=0.9 | 38yrs | Yes! |
The number of postal service mail carriers in California | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
Air pollution in Santa Maria, California | r=0.89 | 38yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.89 | 21yrs | No |
Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale | r=0.86 | 21yrs | No |
Nokia Oyj's stock price (NOK) | r=0.83 | 21yrs | No |
Evaporated and condensed milk consumption | r=0.81 | 32yrs | No |
Robberies in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)