Report an error
Robberies in Oregon correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Randi | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Holly | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Melissa | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mark | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kurt | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Peter | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Philip | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name James | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marie | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Cassie | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Michelle | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
Frozen yogurt consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Australia | r=0.95 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Betty | r=0.89 | 38yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Oregon | r=0.87 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Pierre | r=0.85 | 38yrs | No |
USA Population | r=-0.92 | 38yrs | No |
Robberies in Oregon also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)