Report an error
Popularity of the first name Dylan correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Average length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
The number of data entry keyers in California | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Arson in Idaho | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
The number of computer programmers in Connecticut | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
Ticket sales for Atlanta Braves games | r=0.87 | 45yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Dylan also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)