Report an error
Robberies in New Mexico correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'boujee' | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Average length of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.84 | 11yrs | No |
Car crashes in the US | r=0.83 | 24yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'roll safe' meme | r=0.81 | 17yrs | No |
The number of traffic technicians in New Mexico | r=0.76 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'mocking spongebob' meme | r=0.76 | 17yrs | No |
The number of forensic science technicians in New Mexico | r=0.74 | 19yrs | No |
Total views on 'Be Smart' science YouTube videos | r=0.72 | 10yrs | No |
Robberies in New Mexico also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)