Report an error
Popularity of the first name Jose correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Nuclear power generation in Germany | r=0.98 | 31yrs | No |
| GMO use in cotton | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'learn spanish' | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
| Ice cream consumption | r=0.97 | 32yrs | No |
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Greenland | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
| Motor vehicle thefts in North Carolina | r=0.93 | 38yrs | Yes! |
| Motor vehicle thefts in Maryland | r=0.91 | 38yrs | No |
| Robberies in North Carolina | r=0.91 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jose also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)