Report an error
Motor vehicle thefts in Louisiana correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in law enforcement and firefighting | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mitchell | r=0.95 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marisa | r=0.92 | 38yrs | No |
Disney movies released | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jasmine | r=0.88 | 38yrs | No |
Google searches for 'fbi hotline' | r=0.75 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'dr pepper vs mr pibb' | r=0.7 | 19yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Louisiana also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)