Report an error
Motor vehicle thefts in Massachusetts correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Michael | r=0.99 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Stephanie | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Steven | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Janet | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Peter | r=0.99 | 38yrs | No |
Google searches for 'learn spanish' | r=0.99 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Thomas | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Glenn | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kelly | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Leanne | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Dan | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Andrea | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bobbi | r=0.93 | 38yrs | No |
The wind speed in Boston | r=0.84 | 38yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Massachusetts also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)