Report an error
Burglaries in Puerto Rico correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Alison | r=0.96 | 24yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bryce | r=0.95 | 24yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Janae | r=0.94 | 24yrs | No |
How geeky LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.89 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Savannah | r=0.87 | 24yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emilie | r=0.86 | 24yrs | No |
The number of art directors in Puerto Rico | r=0.69 | 20yrs | No |
Burglaries in Puerto Rico also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)