Report an error
Burglaries in Texas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Randy | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Adrianne | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ashely | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Antoine | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
How 'hip and with it' LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jeremy | r=0.96 | 38yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Tom | r=0.94 | 38yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Texas | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Joel | r=0.9 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Pierre | r=0.88 | 38yrs | No |
Bankruptcy filings in the US | r=0.77 | 24yrs | No |
Burglaries in Texas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)