Report an error
Burglaries in South Dakota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Dominique | r=0.95 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Viewership count for Days of Our Lives | r=0.92 | 37yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.91 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Frozen yogurt consumption | r=0.9 | 32yrs | No |
Average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos | r=0.85 | 14yrs | No |
Burglaries in South Dakota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)