Report an error
Burglaries in Ohio correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Accounting | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
US production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
The number of bill collectors in Ohio | r=0.95 | 20yrs | Yes! |
How 'hip and with it' LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to do magic' | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.89 | 23yrs | No |
The number of musicians in Ohio | r=0.85 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marcus | r=0.83 | 38yrs | No |
Burglaries in Ohio also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)