Report an error
Burglaries in Minnesota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Daniel | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jim | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jenny | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
The number of phlebotomists in Minnesota | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
Burglaries in Minnesota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)