Report an error
Burglaries in Florida correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
US production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Allen | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in literature | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Daniel | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No |
The number of computer programmers in Florida | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and the Sun | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No |
US average milk-fat content of milk fat and skim solids byproduct fluid beverage milk | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.97 | 32yrs | No |
United States music album sales | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Egypt | r=0.96 | 37yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.93 | 32yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Florida | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
US household spending on tobacco products and smoking supplies | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
Burglaries in Florida also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)