Report an error
Arson in Alabama correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Petroluem consumption in Germany, East | r=0.88 | 6yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Seychelles | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations | r=0.82 | 10yrs | No |
Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.81 | 12yrs | No |
The number of umpires and referees in Alabama | r=0.78 | 12yrs | No |
The number of library assistants in Alabama | r=0.77 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.76 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Architecture | r=0.72 | 10yrs | No |
Global revenue generated by McDonald's | r=0.72 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Janelle | r=0.65 | 38yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Cuba | r=0.65 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Australia | r=0.6 | 38yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Mexico | r=0.59 | 35yrs | No |
Arson in Alabama also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)